globalpolicy.org Report : Visit Site


  • Server:nginx/1.10.3...

    The main IP address: 178.63.97.124,Your server Germany,Nuremberg ISP:Hetzner Online AG  TLD:org CountryCode:DE

    The description :global policy forum is a policy watchdog that follows the work of the united nations. we promote accountability and citizen participation in decisions on peace and security, social justice and interna...

    This report updates in 12-Jun-2018

Created Date:1996-02-24

Technical data of the globalpolicy.org


Geo IP provides you such as latitude, longitude and ISP (Internet Service Provider) etc. informations. Our GeoIP service found where is host globalpolicy.org. Currently, hosted in Germany and its service provider is Hetzner Online AG .

Latitude: 49.447780609131
Longitude: 11.068329811096
Country: Germany (DE)
City: Nuremberg
Region: Bayern
ISP: Hetzner Online AG

the related websites

    southampton.ac.uk ukessays.com ebooks.cambridge.org odihpn.org lawteacher.net stateofnature.org globalpolicyjournal.com greenpeace.org warmwell.com bloomberg.com admiral.com aa.com swiftcover.com oaic.gov.au libdems.org.uk jrf.org.uk supanet.com 

HTTP Header Analysis


HTTP Header information is a part of HTTP protocol that a user's browser sends to called nginx/1.10.3 containing the details of what the browser wants and will accept back from the web server.

Content-Encoding:gzip
Transfer-Encoding:chunked
Set-Cookie:666d6601487896d1ae3d7a5782879eb6=piu1k3amo9a6qbnevgia6g9h11; path=/, gpf_tpl=gpf; expires=Sat, 01-Jun-2019 19:29:21 GMT; Max-Age=30672000; path=/
Expires:Mon, 1 Jan 2001 00:00:00 GMT
Vary:Accept-Encoding, Accept-Encoding
Server:nginx/1.10.3
Last-Modified:Mon, 11 Jun 2018 19:29:21 GMT
Connection:keep-alive
Pragma:no-cache
Cache-Control:post-check=0, pre-check=0
Date:Mon, 11 Jun 2018 19:29:21 GMT
P3P:CP="NOI ADM DEV PSAi COM NAV OUR OTRo STP IND DEM"
Content-Type:text/html; charset=utf-8

DNS

soa:ns01.zaehlwerk.net. dns.zaehlwerk.net. 2018041302 86400 7200 2419200 86400
ns:ns01.zaehlwerk.net.
ns02.zaehlwerk.net.
ns03.zaehlwerk.net.
ipv4:IP:178.63.97.124
ASN:24940
OWNER:HETZNER-AS, DE
Country:DE
ipv6:2a01:4f8:121:43c5::5:1//24940//HETZNER-AS, DE//DE
txt:"v=spf1 ip4:94.130.6.5 ip6:2a01:4f8:10a:3fe6:25::1 ip4:185.11.139.220 ip6:2a03:2900:7:44::2 -all"
mx:MX preference = 10, mail exchanger = mx01.zaehlwerk.net.

HtmlToText

-- -- skip to content skip to main navigation skip to 1st column skip to 2nd column global policy forum -- home about gpf about gpf staff board members support gpf gpf partners annual reports and statutes (gpf europe) contact and disclaimer publications publications publications in german tables and charts events upcoming events past events events in germany internships general information on internships internship application newsletter neues briefing: regeln zu wirtschaft und menschenrechten - wirtschaftslobby gegen jegliche verbindlichkeit und wie die politik darauf reagiert in den letzten jahrzehnten haben regierungen eine reihe von maßnahmen initiiert, um unternehmen zur einhaltung von menschenrechten in ihren aktivitäten zu bewegen. seit jahren versuchen interessenvertretungen der wirtschaft, verbindliche regeln im bereich wirtschaft und menschenrechte international und national zu verhindern – mit erfolg. in deutschland zeigte sich dies im jahr 2016, als die deutschen unternehmensvertretungen alle hebel in bewegung setzten, jegliche verbindlichkeit im deutschen nationalen aktionsplan für wirtschaft und menschenrechte (nap) zu verhindern. ein neues briefing von brot für die welt, global policy forum und misereor veranschaulicht, wie die wirtschaftslobby die einführung einer menschenrechtlichen sorgfaltspflicht der wirtschaft verhinderte. es zeigt auf, wie die unternehmensverbände versuchen, ähnliche regelungen auf internationaler ebene, darunter dem europarat, bei der oecd und im menschenrechtsrat der vereinten nationen abzuwehren. read more... looking forward: how can the ffd follow-up live up to its full potential? the addis ababa action agenda (aaaa) has defined the follow-up process for the financing for development process as well as the means of implementation of the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. this includes assessing progress, obstacles, challenges as well as new and emerging topics of relevance, and “provide policy recommendations for action by the international community” (para. 131). at a side-event during the 2018 ecosoc forum on financing for development follo-up, participants are invited to provide their insights into their assessment of previous ffd fora, their link with other international processes, and discuss with participants about opportunities and challenges, also with view to the upcoming high-level dialogue on financing for development of the general assembly in 2019. the format of the side event will be highly interactive. after a short framing presentation, the moderator will facilitate active dialogue with a small panel of respondents and the audience. read more... new working paper: the un foundation - a foundation for the un? the united nations face a funding dilemma. on the one hand, member states continue to transfer new responsibilities to the un system, not least in implementing the 2030 agenda and their sustainable development goals (sdgs); on the other hand, they do not match these mandates with adequate resources. some see the way out of this financial mess in reinforced un partnerships with private donors and their foundations. the un foundation (unf) plays a special role here. it was established by us billionaire ted turner two decades ago principally to champion and support the work of the united nations.the global policy forum, in cooperation with the rosa-luxemburg-stiftung, has taken a closer look at the work of the unf and its special relationship with the un in a new working paper. it describes the origins and the evolution of the unf and its relationship with the un. it shows that, in pursuing this aim, the foundation appears to have developed a business model and growth strategy that primarily promote its own priorities, activities and expansion, while the direct financial support to the un decreased significantly. the unf’s support of the un must also be seen in context. ted turner and the unf leadership have a clear vision of the way to tackle global problems and the role the un should play, centred solidly on public-private partnerships and multi-stakeholder approaches. the unf has been among the driving forces behind the opening of the un towards the business sector. the working paper examines benefits, risks and side effects of these trends, and ends with a few findings and conclusions. read more... neuerscheinung: ungleichheiten verringern! schlüssel zur verwirklichung der agenda 2030 die regierungen haben ein eigenständiges ziel zur reduzierung von ungleichheiten sowohl innerhalb als auch zwischen ländern in den katalog der 17 sdgs aufgenommen – eine der größten qualitativen neuerungen der agenda 2030 gegenüber den mdgs. sdg 10 ist ausdruck des in den letzten jahren enorm gesteigerten interesses in wissenschaft, wirtschaft und politik am komplexen phänomen der sozialen wie ökonomischen, der horizontalen und intersektionalen ungleichheiten. mit dem vorliegenden arbeitspapier werden sdg10 und die daraus zu ziehenden schlussfolgerungen genauer unter die lupe genommen. es beschreibt die verschiedenen formen ökonomischer, sozialer und politischer ungleichheiten und die damit verbundenen indikatoren. und es erörtert, welche ansatzpunkte und politikinstrumente es gibt, um ungleichheit zu reduzieren – und damit der verwirklichung der agenda 2030 einen schritt näher zu kommen. denn ohne die verringerung von ungleichheiten innerhalb und zwischen ländern werden sich auch die anderen ziele der agenda 2030 kaum realisieren lassen. read more... new briefing: one step further towards global regulation of business in 2014, following a resolution initiated by ecuador and south africa, the human rights council of the united nations decided by a majority vote for the establishment of a process to create a human rights treaty to regulate business activity. in 2015 and 2016 the first two sessions of the open-ended intergovernmental working group on transnational corporations and other business enterprises with respect to human rights (oeigwg) took place, and between october 23 and 27, 2017 the working group convened for the third time. more than 100 states and 200 representatives of civil society organizations participated in the third session, during which draft elements for a treaty presented by the chair-rapporteur of the oeigwg were discussed. the draft elements include suggestions on state obligations, prevention, effective remedy, jurisdiction, international co-operation, and enforcement mechanisms. despite persistent efforts by certain states to block the process, the march towards a binding treaty will continue. the chair-rapporteur will now hold informal consultations on the way forward and prospectively prepare a zero draft of the treaty up to the fourth session (expected in october 2018). governments and other actors can hand in comments on the draft elements up to the end of february 2018. read more... justice for people and planet the new report by greenpeace “justice for people and planet” demonstrates the need for urgent action to establish justice for people and planet and to end corporate capture, collusion and impunity. through 20 case studies this report presents how corporate power has been used to repeatedly abuse and violate human and environmental rights. the cases show that corporate impunity for environmental destruction and human rights violations is a result of the current economic and legal system. state failure to protect human rights and the environment is caused by corporate capture of decision makers and state institutions, leading to the consequent refusal of politicians to implement binding frameworks and hold corporations to account. the clear failure of voluntary codes and corporate self-regulation to safeguard human rights or the environment has led to renewed public demand for binding rules. greenpeace calls on governments to adopt 10 principles for corporate accountability. read more... neues bündnis gegen marktmacht der megakonzerne foto: aktion agrar wichtige märkte sind in den händen von immer weniger mega-konzernen. dagegen stellt sich anlässlich des 60. geburtstags des bundeskartellamtes ein breites bündnis von 24 umwelt-, landwirtschafts-, und entwicklungsorganisationen, darunter auch das global policy forum. unsere forderung an die nächste bundesregierung: das kartellrecht verschärfen, um die marktmacht von konzernen zu begrenzen. die marktkonzentration ist mittlerweile so weit fortgeschritten, dass sie kleinere unternehmen stark benachteiligt. zulieferer, bauern und bäuerinnen und arbeiter/innen in produktionsländern können sich gegen übermächtige unternehmen kaum durchsetzen. letztlich wird so die soziale ungleichheit verschärft. read more... neuauflage: die agenda 2030 am 25. september 2015 verabschiedeten die 193 mitgliedsstaaten der vereinten nationen auf einem gipfeltreffen in new york die agenda 2030 für nachhaltige entwicklung. sie bildet den globalen rahmen für die umwelt- und entwicklungspolitik der kommenden 15 jahre. kernstück der agenda sind die 17 ziele für nachhaltige entwicklung, die sdgs, mit ihren 169 zielvorgaben. sie berühren alle politikbereiche, von der wirtschafts-, sozial-, umwelt- und finanzpolitik über die agrar- und verbraucherpolitik bis hin zu bereichen wie verkehr, städtebau, bildung und gesundheit. die vollständig überarbeitete und aktualisierte neuauflage dieses berichts bietet neben einer politischen einordnung der agenda 2030 überblicksartig grundlegende informationen und analysen von sdg 1 bis 17. read more... data is the new gold “data is the new gold” headlined a 2014 article in the business press on the marketing power it offers. “each click, like, and share creates new data in the world, much of which can be used to deliver relevant marketing information and bring increased value to consumer audiences.” picking up on the potential of so-called big data to measure national and global progress on development goals agreed in the 2030 agenda for sustainable development, the 2030 agenda has driven a variety of new initiatives, bringing together a vast array of global corporations, foundations, and csos ready to mine this new seam. read more... einladung: das bisschen haushalt …(?) mit der agenda 2030 und ihren zielen für nachhaltige entwicklung (sdgs) haben die mitgliedsstaaten der vereinten nationen ambitionierte schritte auf dem weg zu einer sozial, ökonomisch und ökologisch gerechteren welt vereinbart. eine zentrale frage lautet nun, wie die umsetzung der sdgs finanziert werden soll und welche rolle dabei die öffentlichen haushalte spielen. bei einem workshop in bonn wollen wir gemeinsam diskutieren: welche rolle spielt die deutsche haushaltspolitik für die verwirklichung der sdgs? wie müsste ein „sdg-konformer“ bundeshaushalt aussehen? welche ansatzpunkte gibt es für zivilgesellschaftliche organisationen, den haushaltsprozess zu beobachten und zu beeinflussen? brauchen wir einen nachhaltigkeits-check für den gesamten bundeshaushalt? welche ansatzpunkte und mögliche instrumentarien gibt es für ein umfassendes „sustainability budgeting“? erfordert die agenda 2030 eine zivilgesellschaftliche „budget watch“-initiative für den bundeshaushalt, wie es sie in anderen ländern gibt? read more... remedies for cross-border human rights violations: a status report on the binding treaty on tncs and other business enterprises to implement the 2030 agenda many in the international community have proclaimed a need to go from “billions to trillions” of dollars. certainly, the transformation of our world requires fundamental changes in the way our societies produce and consume goods and services. at the international level, instruments to hold corporations accountable for human rights abuses and the violation of social and environmental standards are weak. victims of human rights violations by corporations often face insurmountable barriers to access justice. a regulation gap exists especially with regard to corporations operating transnationally. against this background, the un human rights council’s resolution of 26 june 2014 establishing an open-ended intergovernmental working group (oeigwg) to elaborate an international legally binding instrument to regulate within the scope of international human rights law and the activities of transnational corporations and other business enterprises deserve to be called historic. at this public event the panelists will discuss how a binding treaty could overcome obstacles for remedy in cases of cross-border human rights violations by tncs. it will further inform about the state of the treaty process and next steps to be taken. read more... new briefing: procedure and format - options for an un treaty on business and human rights in 2014, following a resolution initiated by ecuador and south africa, the human rights council of the united nations decided by a majority vote to establish a process to create a human rights treaty to regulate business activity. since 2015, the open-ended intergovernmental working group on transnational corporations and other business enterprises with respect to human rights has convened three times, and substantial discussion about the scope and content of the prospective treaty has taken place. it is now time to explore the possible forms of such an instrument and set out the options for the way forward in the process. good rules and procedures can make treaty negotiations move more effectively forward and open doors to getting the best advice and text into an agreement. the substance of an agreement and the procedures to achieve that agreement are closely inter-connected. consequently, this paper has three parts. the first and second parts look at the choice of contents and format of the agreement. the third part provides options for the institutional settings needed with regard to a bureau, the hrc secretariat, the relationship to other un entities and processes, and the financial questions to be solved. it also elaborates on the options for the drafting process itself with regard to the drafting of the text, the structure, and the timetable of negotiations. the third part further assesses the options for participation of civil society organizations and business. read more... neuerscheinung: die agenda 2030, geberprioritäten und ein neuer funding compact der un die vereinten nationen (un) und viele ihrer sonderorganisationen befinden sich seit jahren in einer strukturellen finanzierungskrise. es besteht eine zunehmende diskrepanz zwischen den anforderungen der mitgliedstaaten an die un und den ihr zur verfügung gestellten mitteln. in den letzten jahren konnte ein trend weg von pflicht- und flexibel einsetzbaren beiträgen der un-mitgliedstaaten hin zu freiwilligen und zweckgebundenen mitteln einer vielzahl von gebern beobachtet werden. im zuge dieses trends verfügen die einzelnen geber, ob öffentlich oder privat, über einen wachsenden spielraum zur einflussnahme auf die arbeit der un-organisationen. besonders deutlich ist dies im fall der weltgesundheitsorganisation (who). als reaktion auf die finanzierungsprobleme schlug un-generalsekretär antónio guterres im juni 2017 im rahmen des reformprozesses zur neustrukturierung des un-entwicklungssystems die schaffung eines sogenannten funding compact vor, eines finanzierungspaktes zwischen den mitgliedstaaten und dem un-entwicklungssystem. read more... strategies for empowering rural women – side-event on the margins of 62nd csw a public panel organized by rls-nyc, dawn, gpf and social watch on march 12, 2018, will discuss the multiple roles of rural women and girls for enhancing food sovereignty, preserving biodiversity, reducing inequalities, and combating climate change. presentations will affirm the importance of engaging women in policy-making around more equitable and sustainable production and consumption. panelists will offer perspectives from the local level, addressing challenges such as intellectual property rights and land ownership for small-scale women farmers. we will also discuss the opportunities and shortcomings of a human rights approach and global advocacy efforts to increasing women's participation in decision-making to tackle poverty, malnutrition, and environmental degradation. additionally, the panel will discuss approaches to advancing gender equality for rural women by analyzing the challenges small-scale women farmers face due to economic stressors such as food insecurity, hunger, and poverty. read more... neuerscheinung: agenda 2030, nachhaltigkeitsziele und haushaltspolitik mit der agenda 2030 und ihren zielen für nachhaltige entwicklung (sdgs) haben die mitgliedsstaaten der vereinten nationen ambitionierte schritte auf dem weg zu einer sozial, ökonomisch und ökologisch gerechteren welt vereinbart. eine zentrale frage lautet nun, wie die umsetzung der sdgs finanziert werden soll und welche rolle dabei die öffentlichen haushalte spielen. bundesregierung, bundestag und zivilgesellschaftliche organisationen haben unterschiedliche rollen, verantwortlichkeiten und entsprechend unterschiedliche einflussmöglichkeiten, um den bundeshaushalt „sdg-konform“ zu machen. im verlauf der verschiedenen phasen des budgetzyklus gibt es für sie eine vielzahl von handlungs- und interventionsmöglichkeiten, die sie stärker als bisher nutzen sollten. read more... market discourse has captured the development agenda to a point that may be incompatible with un mandates civicus speaks with barbara adams, senior policy analyst at the global policy forum about the united nations' turn to the the corporate sector. adams explains that a trend for multi-stakeholder partnerships can be observed. this has been reinforced by the 2030 agenda, and the push for its implementation and achievement of the sdgs. the accompanying policy influence, programme distortions, undermining of the 2030 agenda and ability to achieve the sustainable development goals have, however, not been adequately addressed. read more... rethinking the un security council: a book launch the un security council remains a mysterious body, hid­den most of the time behind a strict security perimeter and many closed door meetings. to understand the council, it is necessary to penetrate a thick­et of myth and to examine the web of ideology, fear, and ambition that motivates its members. to promote a council fit for the future, we must be ambitious, with a goal of thor­oughgoing transformation. for one thing is clear: cautious pragmatism will not do. the book “of foxes and chickens: oligarchy and global power in the un security council” by james a. paul is based on the author’s unique access to the council over many years. providing a new and critical reading of the institution, it considers the council’s history, its mode of operation, and its many sanctions regimes, military operations, and other initiatives, as well as its role as a “theater” in which great power rivalries are regularly on display. read more... neues briefing: agenda 2030 kommunal die umsetzung der agenda 2030 und ihrer ziele für nachhaltige entwicklung (sdgs) in und durch deutschland ist nicht ausschließlich eine bundesangelegenheit. auch den städten und kommunen kommt eine wichtige rolle bei der verwirklichung der agenda zu. viele haben inzwischen diskussionsprozesse zur umsetzung der sdgs auf lokaler ebene eingeleitet. beispielsweise haben 15 städte und kreise in nordrhein-westfalen, darunter köln, dortmund und bonn, beschlossen, die globalen nachhaltigkeitsziele auf die kommunale ebene „herunterzubrechen“ und integrierte nachhaltigkeitsstrategien zu erarbeiten. dabei muss das rad keinesfalls neu erfunden werden. vielmehr können prozesse zur umsetzung der agenda 2030 auf lokaler ebene auf bestehenden initiativen und institutionen aufbauen und diese neu beleben. read more... urgent climate action as key component of the 2030 agenda on sustainable development it is no secret that a dual relationship exists between climate change and sustainable development. the 2030 agenda with its 17 sustainable development goals (sdgs), which governments agreed in september 2015, recognizes that climate change is “one of the greatest challenges of our time” and voices concern about “its adverse impacts undermine the ability of all countries to achieve sustainable development.” in order to ensure that the implementation of the paris agreement truly helps foster more just and sustainable development, governments have to respect human rights, question the partnership and multi-stakeholder approach, reclaim policies for the public and strengthen participatory and democratic governance structures, and tackle vertical and horizontal inequalities in and between countries. read more... un partnerships in the public interest? not yet. the world bank, together with the international monetary fund (imf) and the development banks, have been proclaiming since 2015 that “to meet the investment needs of the sustainable development goals (sdgs), the global community needs to move the discussion from ‘billions to trillions’” — that is from billions in official development assistance (oda) to trillions in investments of all kinds: public and private, national and global, in both capital and capacity. further, many member states have promoted and the un has been exploring so-called ‘blended financing’ as a major vehicle to “leverage” or ‘crowding in’, corporate funds. deputy secretary-general (d s-g) amina mohammed declared in her first remarks as d s-g: “bringing partnerships and agencies together in a coherent and more coordinated manner will further leverage resources and different partnerships in a mobile [development] agenda, this is becoming more complex but it is bringing in more returns.” read more... more articles... new position paper: toward global regulation on human rights and business launch of spotlight on sustainable development 2017 in geneva bündniszeitung zum un-treaty zu wirtschaft und menschenrechte letter from csos about the agenda of the wto european ngos call on the eu and its member states to constructively support the negotiations around a binding treaty on business and human rights geplantes un-abkommen zu wirtschaft und menschenrechten: vertragsentwurf ist gute verhandlungsgrundlage neues gpf briefing: einmal 0,7 prozent sind nicht genug public-private partnerships: defusing the ticking time bomb a 10-point roadmap for europe on the role of the private sector in development the g20 and the 2030 agenda: contradictions and conflicts at the hamburg summit areas of work corporate influence global policy watch globalization social and economic policy ngos un finance international justice un reform special topics world food & hunger the dark side of natural resources global taxes humanitarian intervention? private military and security companies tables and charts archived sections iraq conflict empire ngo working group on un-ngo relations security council nations & states working groups ngo working group on food & hunger more from gpf fair use notice : this page contains copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. global policy forum distributes this material without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. we believe this constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in 17 u.s.c § 107. if you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond fair use, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. global policy forum 205 e 42nd st. | 20th floor | new york, ny 10017 | usa gpf[ät]globalpolicy.org copyright © 2005 - 2018 global policy forum. designed by joomlart.com joomla! is free software released under the gnu general public license.

URL analysis for globalpolicy.org


https://www.globalpolicy.org/ngos.html
https://www.globalpolicy.org/internships/general-information-on-internships.html
https://www.globalpolicy.org/qhumanitarianq-intervention.html
https://www.globalpolicy.org/component/content/article/270-general/53027-geplantes-un-abkommen-zu-wirtschaft-und-menschenrechten-vertragsentwurf-ist-gute-verhandlungsgrundlage.html
https://www.globalpolicy.org/component/content/article/271-general/53043-neuerscheinung-agenda-2030-nachhaltigkeitsziele-und-haushaltspolitik.html
https://www.globalpolicy.org/the-dark-side-of-natural-resources-st.html
https://www.globalpolicy.org/component/content/article/270-general/53031-2017-10-16-16-31-36.html
https://www.globalpolicy.org/empire.html
https://www.globalpolicy.org/un-reform.html
https://www.globalpolicy.org/un-finance.html
https://www.globalpolicy.org/component/content/article/271-general/53046-2018-03-12-11-21-58.html
https://www.globalpolicy.org/about-gpf-mm/staff-mm.html
https://www.globalpolicy.org/component/content/article/271-general/53038-neuauflage-die-agenda-2030.html
https://www.globalpolicy.org/newsletter-mm.html
https://www.globalpolicy.org/component/content/article/272-general/53051-looking-forward-how-can-the-ffd-follow-up-live-up-to-its-full-potential.html

Whois Information


Whois is a protocol that is access to registering information. You can reach when the website was registered, when it will be expire, what is contact details of the site with the following informations. In a nutshell, it includes these informations;

Domain Name: GLOBALPOLICY.ORG
Registry Domain ID: D214040-LROR
Registrar WHOIS Server:
Registrar URL: http://www.psi-usa.info
Updated Date: 2017-02-26T01:49:14Z
Creation Date: 1996-02-24T05:00:00Z
Registry Expiry Date: 2018-02-25T05:00:00Z
Registrar Registration Expiration Date:
Registrar: PSI-USA, Inc. dba Domain Robot
Registrar IANA ID: 151
Registrar Abuse Contact Email:
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone:
Reseller:
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
Registry Registrant ID: C166512677-LROR
Registrant Name: Global Policy Forum
Registrant Organization: Global Policy Forum
Registrant Street: Koenigstr. 37a
Registrant City: Bonn
Registrant State/Province: DE
Registrant Postal Code: 53115
Registrant Country: DE
Registrant Phone: +49.70717939331
Registrant Phone Ext:
Registrant Fax: +49.70717939332
Registrant Fax Ext:
Registrant Email: [email protected]
Registry Admin ID: C164735804-LROR
Admin Name: DNS Admin
Admin Organization: Zaehlwerk
Admin Street: Stauffenbergstr. 30
Admin City: Tuebingen
Admin State/Province: Baden-Wuerttemberg
Admin Postal Code: 72074
Admin Country: DE
Admin Phone: +49.70717939331
Admin Phone Ext:
Admin Fax: +49.70717939332
Admin Fax Ext:
Admin Email: [email protected]
Registry Tech ID: C164735804-LROR
Tech Name: DNS Admin
Tech Organization: Zaehlwerk
Tech Street: Stauffenbergstr. 30
Tech City: Tuebingen
Tech State/Province: Baden-Wuerttemberg
Tech Postal Code: 72074
Tech Country: DE
Tech Phone: +49.70717939331
Tech Phone Ext:
Tech Fax: +49.70717939332
Tech Fax Ext:
Tech Email: [email protected]
Name Server: NS01.ZAEHLWERK.NET
Name Server: NS02.ZAEHLWERK.NET
Name Server: NS03.ZAEHLWERK.NET
Name Server: NS04.ZAEHLWERK.NET
DNSSEC: unsigned
URL of the ICANN Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form: https://www.icann.org/wicf/
>>> Last update of WHOIS database: 2017-09-23T10:39:41Z <<<

For more information on Whois status codes, please visit https://icann.org/epp

Access to Public Interest Registry WHOIS information is provided to assist persons in determining the contents of a domain name registration record in the Public Interest Registry registry database. The data in this record is provided by Public Interest Registry for informational purposes only, and Public Interest Registry does not guarantee its accuracy. This service is intended only for query-based access. You agree that you will use this data only for lawful purposes and that, under no circumstances will you use this data to: (a) allow, enable, or otherwise support the transmission by e-mail, telephone, or facsimile of mass unsolicited, commercial advertising or solicitations to entities other than the data recipient's own existing customers; or (b) enable high volume, automated, electronic processes that send queries or data to the systems of Registry Operator, a Registrar, or Afilias except as reasonably necessary to register domain names or modify existing registrations. All rights reserved. Public Interest Registry reserves the right to modify these terms at any time. By submitting this query, you agree to abide by this policy.

  REFERRER http://www.pir.org/

  REGISTRAR Public Interest Registry

SERVERS

  SERVER org.whois-servers.net

  ARGS globalpolicy.org

  PORT 43

  TYPE domain

DOMAIN

  NAME globalpolicy.org

  HANDLE D214040-LROR

  CREATED 1996-02-24

STATUS
clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited

NSERVER

  NS01.ZAEHLWERK.NET 136.243.37.109

  NS02.ZAEHLWERK.NET 109.230.199.80

  NS03.ZAEHLWERK.NET 45.58.34.198

  NS04.ZAEHLWERK.NET 136.243.1.121

OWNER

  HANDLE C166512677-LROR

  NAME Global Policy Forum

  ORGANIZATION Global Policy Forum

ADDRESS

STREET
Koenigstr. 37a

  CITY Bonn

  STATE DE

  PCODE 53115

  COUNTRY DE

  PHONE +49.70717939331

  EMAIL [email protected]

ADMIN

  HANDLE C164735804-LROR

  NAME DNS Admin

  ORGANIZATION Zaehlwerk

ADDRESS

STREET
Stauffenbergstr. 30

  CITY Tuebingen

  STATE Baden-Wuerttemberg

  PCODE 72074

  COUNTRY DE

  PHONE +49.70717939331

  EMAIL [email protected]

TECH

  HANDLE C164735804-LROR

  NAME DNS Admin

  ORGANIZATION Zaehlwerk

ADDRESS

STREET
Stauffenbergstr. 30

  CITY Tuebingen

  STATE Baden-Wuerttemberg

  PCODE 72074

  COUNTRY DE

  PHONE +49.70717939331

  EMAIL [email protected]

  REGISTERED yes

Go to top

Mistakes


The following list shows you to spelling mistakes possible of the internet users for the website searched .

  • www.uglobalpolicy.com
  • www.7globalpolicy.com
  • www.hglobalpolicy.com
  • www.kglobalpolicy.com
  • www.jglobalpolicy.com
  • www.iglobalpolicy.com
  • www.8globalpolicy.com
  • www.yglobalpolicy.com
  • www.globalpolicyebc.com
  • www.globalpolicyebc.com
  • www.globalpolicy3bc.com
  • www.globalpolicywbc.com
  • www.globalpolicysbc.com
  • www.globalpolicy#bc.com
  • www.globalpolicydbc.com
  • www.globalpolicyfbc.com
  • www.globalpolicy&bc.com
  • www.globalpolicyrbc.com
  • www.urlw4ebc.com
  • www.globalpolicy4bc.com
  • www.globalpolicyc.com
  • www.globalpolicybc.com
  • www.globalpolicyvc.com
  • www.globalpolicyvbc.com
  • www.globalpolicyvc.com
  • www.globalpolicy c.com
  • www.globalpolicy bc.com
  • www.globalpolicy c.com
  • www.globalpolicygc.com
  • www.globalpolicygbc.com
  • www.globalpolicygc.com
  • www.globalpolicyjc.com
  • www.globalpolicyjbc.com
  • www.globalpolicyjc.com
  • www.globalpolicync.com
  • www.globalpolicynbc.com
  • www.globalpolicync.com
  • www.globalpolicyhc.com
  • www.globalpolicyhbc.com
  • www.globalpolicyhc.com
  • www.globalpolicy.com
  • www.globalpolicyc.com
  • www.globalpolicyx.com
  • www.globalpolicyxc.com
  • www.globalpolicyx.com
  • www.globalpolicyf.com
  • www.globalpolicyfc.com
  • www.globalpolicyf.com
  • www.globalpolicyv.com
  • www.globalpolicyvc.com
  • www.globalpolicyv.com
  • www.globalpolicyd.com
  • www.globalpolicydc.com
  • www.globalpolicyd.com
  • www.globalpolicycb.com
  • www.globalpolicycom
  • www.globalpolicy..com
  • www.globalpolicy/com
  • www.globalpolicy/.com
  • www.globalpolicy./com
  • www.globalpolicyncom
  • www.globalpolicyn.com
  • www.globalpolicy.ncom
  • www.globalpolicy;com
  • www.globalpolicy;.com
  • www.globalpolicy.;com
  • www.globalpolicylcom
  • www.globalpolicyl.com
  • www.globalpolicy.lcom
  • www.globalpolicy com
  • www.globalpolicy .com
  • www.globalpolicy. com
  • www.globalpolicy,com
  • www.globalpolicy,.com
  • www.globalpolicy.,com
  • www.globalpolicymcom
  • www.globalpolicym.com
  • www.globalpolicy.mcom
  • www.globalpolicy.ccom
  • www.globalpolicy.om
  • www.globalpolicy.ccom
  • www.globalpolicy.xom
  • www.globalpolicy.xcom
  • www.globalpolicy.cxom
  • www.globalpolicy.fom
  • www.globalpolicy.fcom
  • www.globalpolicy.cfom
  • www.globalpolicy.vom
  • www.globalpolicy.vcom
  • www.globalpolicy.cvom
  • www.globalpolicy.dom
  • www.globalpolicy.dcom
  • www.globalpolicy.cdom
  • www.globalpolicyc.om
  • www.globalpolicy.cm
  • www.globalpolicy.coom
  • www.globalpolicy.cpm
  • www.globalpolicy.cpom
  • www.globalpolicy.copm
  • www.globalpolicy.cim
  • www.globalpolicy.ciom
  • www.globalpolicy.coim
  • www.globalpolicy.ckm
  • www.globalpolicy.ckom
  • www.globalpolicy.cokm
  • www.globalpolicy.clm
  • www.globalpolicy.clom
  • www.globalpolicy.colm
  • www.globalpolicy.c0m
  • www.globalpolicy.c0om
  • www.globalpolicy.co0m
  • www.globalpolicy.c:m
  • www.globalpolicy.c:om
  • www.globalpolicy.co:m
  • www.globalpolicy.c9m
  • www.globalpolicy.c9om
  • www.globalpolicy.co9m
  • www.globalpolicy.ocm
  • www.globalpolicy.co
  • globalpolicy.orgm
  • www.globalpolicy.con
  • www.globalpolicy.conm
  • globalpolicy.orgn
  • www.globalpolicy.col
  • www.globalpolicy.colm
  • globalpolicy.orgl
  • www.globalpolicy.co
  • www.globalpolicy.co m
  • globalpolicy.org
  • www.globalpolicy.cok
  • www.globalpolicy.cokm
  • globalpolicy.orgk
  • www.globalpolicy.co,
  • www.globalpolicy.co,m
  • globalpolicy.org,
  • www.globalpolicy.coj
  • www.globalpolicy.cojm
  • globalpolicy.orgj
  • www.globalpolicy.cmo
Show All Mistakes Hide All Mistakes